This web site is not a part of American Express. To visit American Express go to http://www.americanexpress.com
Ameriprise Financial has not authorized this website. Ameriprise Financial is located at http://www.ameriprise.com.
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register


Ameriprise Suck on FaceBook Ameriprise Suck on Twitter
  American Express Sux - Do Leave Home Without It!Ameriprise Sucks!
 
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Why I left after 3 years .... (Read 1666 times)
los3steve
Amexsux Junior Member
**
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 51

Why I left after 3 years ....
Feb 29th, 2008, 5:32pm
 
Most would agree that if you make it past your second year as an advisor at Ameriprise, your workplace experience improves dramatically. The phone clinics go away, you are no longer micromanaged, no more 60hrs workweek and most importantly: no more pressure to push inappropriate products just to make a paycheck. As a level 3 advisor (LOS 3+), I worked 9-4pm, my time was spent meeting with my best clients, writing REAL financial plans (not the McMeal plans that new advisors "write"), doing was best for my clients and getting rewarded with an occasional refferal client. I was making an honest and guilt-free $70K/yr.

But then "Greenfield" came along. "Greenfield" is the code name for Ameriprise's new strategy for managing its employees. All the sudden, to keep my job as is, I needed to write a rolling $130K (the new minimum is 100% of pace!). If I fell below it, I would go back to the preappointee schedule of phone clinics, classes and 60hr workweeks. That meant that I would have to go back to cold-calling and pushing innapropriate products all over again to keep the practice and income that I had built in the last three years.

Now, the FVP told me it would not be so bad because as a level 3 advisor, I qualified for "PLANSOURCE".  Plansource would allow me to spend more time marketing and making the money I needed to stay where I was. How is that you ask? Well, Plansource is a financial plan outsourcing service from India that writes financial plans for advisors.  According to my FVP, I would have no problem meeting the metrics for "Greenfield" because all my plans would now be written by reps in India!  I would no longer have to worry about financial planning and I could spend all time marketing!!!!

So basically, Ameriprise wanted me to become a fulltime telemarketer who pretends to be a financial advisor. Worse yet, my clients would now have their financial futures written by reps in India who need not be licensed, have an education or have any experience whatsoever.  My clients did not hire me to have me hand them off to Indian reps for their planning.  So, I left.



Back to top
 
 

 
1styrP1
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Member of AMP Nation
Posts: 641

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #1 - Feb 29th, 2008, 5:57pm
 
Can't argue about your thoughts on Plansource.  Not only is someone else in a different country getting paid to do something that someone in our country could get paid for (and help our fledgling economy), but that person has never met my clients and I end up spending more time reviewing what these Indians have written to make sure its not all f***ed up than I would just writing it myself.
Back to top
 

Really 5thyrP2, but don't feel like changing the screenname
 

 
p1birminghamsux
Amexsux New User
*
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 32

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #2 - Mar 1st, 2008, 10:01am
 
All I'm going to say to that is WOW!!!
Back to top
 
 

 
newwoomap1
Amexsux Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 275

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #3 - Mar 3rd, 2008, 8:10am
 
i am wondering:

is it really that hard to write 130k rolling as an LOS3?

how would keeping the writing of fin. plans in the US help our fledgin economy?

I am amazing that AMP is outsourcing the advice they so proudly tout as the best in the business...i've dealth with India in the financial services industry and find it extremely hard to believe that this advice is going to be top notch...but then again, the Indians will use the same software as the advisors, so is their advice top notch?
Back to top
 

Posted by: aisa/MACACACA Posted on: Today (3/4/2009) at 3:34pm:

"OMG - you don't know that 270bps is .27%."
 

 
FunkyMOTU
Amexsux New User
*
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 35

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #4 - Mar 3rd, 2008, 4:04pm
 
$130k is not as easy as some would think.  Plansource is a horrible idea.  Do you really want your financial future being written by some dude in India who has knows absolutely nothing about you outside of numbers on a table?  Advisor will provide some guidance on writing the actual plan but I still hate the idea.
Back to top
 
 

 
p1birminghamsux
Amexsux New User
*
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 32

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #5 - Mar 3rd, 2008, 7:59pm
 
130K is cake.  Just not at Ameriprise.  Someone who writes 130K at any other firm is a laughing stock.  I had to write 120K my first year at the firm I'm with now to keep my job.  That was one of the reasons I was scared to leave, but once I left I haven't looked back.  I made 1st year, second year top achiever and whatever other rinky dink award is that amp gives out and didn't make SH*% to show for it.
Back to top
 
 

 
1styrP1
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Member of AMP Nation
Posts: 641

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #6 - Mar 3rd, 2008, 8:59pm
 
newwoomap1 wrote on Mar 3rd, 2008, 8:10am:
i am wondering:

is it really that hard to write 130k rolling as an LOS3?

how would keeping the writing of fin. plans in the US help our fledgin economy?

I am amazing that AMP is outsourcing the advice they so proudly tout as the best in the business...i've dealth with India in the financial services industry and find it extremely hard to believe that this advice is going to be top notch...but then again, the Indians will use the same software as the advisors, so is their advice top notch?


I'm LOS3 and its certainly not easy to write a rolling $130k, but its not beyond the realm of possibility.  I wrote $105k last year as LOS2 for most of the year but about half of that was from 4 big cases.

It would stimulate the economy because wages would be paid to our own citizens and it would create jobs, pretty simple really.
Back to top
 

Really 5thyrP2, but don't feel like changing the screenname
 

 
newwoomap1
Amexsux Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 275

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #7 - Mar 4th, 2008, 6:30am
 
1styrP1...you've got to be kidding me....how many jobs would be "created" with people in the US writing plans...1000-2000 max?  that would add a pretty insignificant amount to US GDP...also, if you, as an AMP advisor, take the time you would have spent on writing the plan, to go out and market and grow your business, you as an advisor would probably add a lot more to GDP than the minimum wage workers writing these plans...so again, please support your claims...it seems to be nonsense.
Back to top
 

Posted by: aisa/MACACACA Posted on: Today (3/4/2009) at 3:34pm:

"OMG - you don't know that 270bps is .27%."
 

 
1styrP1
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Member of AMP Nation
Posts: 641

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #8 - Mar 4th, 2008, 6:58am
 
I told you in the first post, I would probably spend more time reviewing the plans written by the indians to make sure they didn't screw anything up than I would if I wrote the plans myself.  

Whats wrong with 1,000-2,000 extra jobs???  If 50-60 more corporations in America did the same thing and created a few more jobs, whats that, 50,000-60,000 extra jobs AT LEAST right there?  Come on, I'm not saying that Ameriprise would save the country, but it would be a nice contribution.  Tell me that our economy doesn't need it at this point.  Are you saying that our economy doesn't need all it can be given at this point?
Back to top
 

Really 5thyrP2, but don't feel like changing the screenname
 

 
newwoomap1
Amexsux Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 275

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #9 - Mar 4th, 2008, 7:12am
 
Our economy needs better fiscal and monetary policy.  This is out of the hands of the private sector.

Inflationary pressures will become a major issue as the FED continues to cut rates...this will continue to drive down the value of the dollar, weakening our purchasing power abroad and making imports even more expensive.  This is the major issue at hand.  

Also, recent tax relief given in the Bush administration has lowered the government's revenues, increasing the need to borrow, sending our current account and trade deficits to all time highs.  We need to implement policy to reverse this trend or things can only get worse.

More jobs isn't really a solution.  If you look @ the recent jobless claims you will see that unemployment in the US is not an issue.  We are close to historic lows of unemployment. (oh wait, economic data isn't observed by amp advisors now is it?)

Also, 50-60k jobs is about half to a third of what the labor market fluctuates on a weekly basis.  The impact that you mentioned is still insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
Back to top
 

Posted by: aisa/MACACACA Posted on: Today (3/4/2009) at 3:34pm:

"OMG - you don't know that 270bps is .27%."
 

 
FunkyMOTU
Amexsux New User
*
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 35

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #10 - Mar 4th, 2008, 7:22am
 
i agree with birmingham on the point that $130k is hard at Amp but at other firms definitely not.  I think this is primarily due to target markets.  At AMP they're like 300 dials and that's a good week.  I remember when I was an assistant at Merrill, there was a new guy and all he would do is page the phone book.  Dial from 8 AM to 6 PM.  That was it.  

Now in terms of the economy (not gonna get into a political debate about whose fault or what not), this is due anyways.  I think we were in the second longest bull market in history up until this decline began.  Let it go down, it it take its course.  I'm not opposed to buying stocks on sale while everyone else sells.
Back to top
 
 

 
MINvarPORTwiz
Centurion Member
*****
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 1159

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #11 - Mar 4th, 2008, 11:16am
 
There is this thing -- its called free trade, under the terms of which EVERYONE wins / gains. It is one of the few universal truths of economics and was resolved by a David Ricardo in the 1830's.
Back to top
 
 

 
1styrP1
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Member of AMP Nation
Posts: 641

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #12 - Mar 4th, 2008, 5:34pm
 
newwoomap1 wrote on Mar 4th, 2008, 7:12am:
Our economy needs better fiscal and monetary policy.  This is out of the hands of the private sector.

Inflationary pressures will become a major issue as the FED continues to cut rates...this will continue to drive down the value of the dollar, weakening our purchasing power abroad and making imports even more expensive.  This is the major issue at hand.  

Also, recent tax relief given in the Bush administration has lowered the government's revenues, increasing the need to borrow, sending our current account and trade deficits to all time highs.  We need to implement policy to reverse this trend or things can only get worse.

More jobs isn't really a solution.  If you look @ the recent jobless claims you will see that unemployment in the US is not an issue.  We are close to historic lows of unemployment. (oh wait, economic data isn't observed by amp advisors now is it?)

Also, 50-60k jobs is about half to a third of what the labor market fluctuates on a weekly basis.  The impact that you mentioned is still insignificant in the grand scheme of things.


Ok, if national unemployment isn't a concern, then take a look at local unemployment.  Take 4 or 5 of some cities or counties that are among the highest rate of unemployment in the country and set up Ameriprise offices there that are specifically geared towards the financial plan writing side.  Problem solved.  Ameriprise wasn't created to solve the problem of helping out the unemployment rate, but if they can keep from outsourcing thousands of jobs that they could easily keep domestic then why not do it?  

FYI, the more cheap cracks that you make at someone, the more irrelevant you sound.  Can we keep the conversation on an adult level?
Back to top
 

Really 5thyrP2, but don't feel like changing the screenname
 

 
formerfa
Amexsux Full Member
***
Offline


Member of Amexsux
Posts: 118

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #13 - Mar 5th, 2008, 10:48am
 
"Ok, if national unemployment isn't a concern, then take a look at local unemployment.  Take 4 or 5 of some cities or counties that are among the highest rate of unemployment in the country and set up Ameriprise offices there that are specifically geared towards the financial plan writing side.  Problem solved.  Ameriprise wasn't created to solve the problem of helping out the unemployment rate, but if they can keep from outsourcing thousands of jobs that they could easily keep domestic then why not do it?"

Whoever wrote this is either kidding or completely insane.  Your answer to stop outsourcing jobs to India is to have Americans writing plans for Ameriprise? That has to be one of the dumbest ideas i have ever heard!  What they should do is train monkeys to write the plans then you could have a revenue generator for local and city zoos so that they wouldnt have to depend on ticket sales and donations it would be a "win-win" as they say at Ameriprise! I have written a preliminary script for calling local zoos.

Hello, my name is (your name), i am a local financial advisor with Ameriprise Financial. How is your day going? (start with some small talk).  I am calling to let your zoo know about a new program where we teach a group of monkeys or other primates how to write financial plans for low net-worth and high debt to income clients. Does this sound like something you would be interested in?

I think it would work out great and it would keep these jobs in the USA!!!
Back to top
 
 

 
1styrP1
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Member of AMP Nation
Posts: 641

Re: Why I left after 3 years ....
Reply #14 - Mar 6th, 2008, 6:33pm
 
newwoomap1 wrote on Mar 4th, 2008, 7:12am:
More jobs isn't really a solution.  If you look @ the recent jobless claims you will see that unemployment in the US is not an issue.  We are close to historic lows of unemployment. (oh wait, economic data isn't observed by amp advisors now is it?)


http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/06/news/economy/jobs_outlook/index.htm?postversion=...

I guess its not observed by me...?
Back to top
 

Really 5thyrP2, but don't feel like changing the screenname
 

 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print

Please post in English.

  American Express not taken here!

This message board is not affiliated with American Express or Ameriprise.
By entering this site you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
Feel free to use the postings on this message board for any article you may wish to write. Please mention this site in your article if you use any of the postings for your research.